News

This category will talk of the news of the day and our analysis of the event.

Introduction

The resurgence of trade tensions between the United States and China, reignited by Trump-era tariffs, has sent ripples across global supply chains. While the spotlight often remains fixed on the US and China, India could be a silent but significant beneficiary. 

As China scrambles to counterbalance its reduced access to the US market and global corporations seek alternative manufacturing destinations, India finds itself at the crossroads of economic opportunity and strategic recalibration. This article explores how India can use this geopolitical and trade disruption to rebalance its financial relationship with China, reduce its chronic trade deficit, and emerge stronger in the global value chain.

The Current Indo-China Trade Equation

India’s trade relationship with China is both critical and complicated. According to India’s Ministry of Commerce, China is India’s second-largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $136.2 billion in FY2023. However, the trade is overwhelmingly skewed—India imports around $101 billion worth of goods while exporting only about $35 billion, leaving a trade deficit of over $66 billion.

The imports are concentrated in critical sectors like electronics, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, making India structurally dependent on Chinese inputs. This reliance limits India’s bargaining power in the global trade hierarchy and exposes vulnerabilities, especially during geopolitical or economic shocks. 

Trump’s Tariffs and Global Trade Realignment

Former US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies on Chinese goods—first initiated in 2018 and recently revived in rhetoric during his 2024 re-election campaign—have thrown global trade dynamics into flux. These tariffs, aimed at protecting American industry, are inadvertently reshuffling supply chains globally.

According to a recent Economic Times editorial, Trump’s tariffs have created “global overcapacity” as China seeks to redirect its manufacturing exports away from the US and into other markets—including India. Simultaneously, the US is looking to de-risk Chinese supply chains, creating space for new manufacturing hubs like India and Vietnam to fill the void (Economic Times).  

A Strategic Window for India

Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has highlighted that India must not miss this rare opportunity (India Today). The reshuffling of global trade offers India a chance to reduce its trade deficit with China and rebalance the structural terms of the relationship.

This rebalancing is not about decoupling—it’s about redefining dependencies in areas where India can become a supplier rather than a perpetual buyer. With China looking to expand into newer markets due to US restrictions, India can negotiate better access to Chinese markets for its exports—especially in IT services, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural products.

AD 4nXdUQNZDesZt7bFFCawnMV2h6lSkjuldmPlnmPZRc78E7Wkq45ulJh8 gbcl5EN1zbLpWpyAMxJ AW3VmDJw0eoFl0cJUc1BZZAkupTePfjQOWp0uuK9fan2A1AI1fnvp5Eh8 XAAA?key=

What Can Be Done?

1. Push for Sectoral Diversification in Trade

India must aggressively expand its export base to China. Pharmaceuticals, where India is a global leader, represent a small fraction of its exports to China, primarily due to regulatory bottlenecks. Streamlining approvals with Chinese regulators can unlock billions in potential exports. 

AD 4nXcdy hRfgpKgRT 4Lt1dh uNxjfPIQfVtzhXTZW0XMgGb20M9OxAqzv0Qq27WTUiKmizfMGgEATq39PnAV1po 1Vh4hhYXYLCB 5dDOubs8qRy49RP1N882mfOAe3Qp2vyd7xvY?key=
Source: Department of Commerce 

AD 4nXcV1n9vc uKyKB6UwUDFGVqdoUaAKfswbq0a a91Ig2zJovT437dSQvmxHWt7xM1sCZCMyHNqzUIjeLE24gHpH09tgC79X8g DHX2qUbYqgwV8VNwVozPjA8u xsZNlmHsbVUaSfQ?key=
Source: Pharmexcil, Ministry of Commerce,

2. Leverage the PLI Schemes for Electronics and Semiconductors

Production-linked Incentive (PLI) schemes launched by the Indian government in electronics, textiles, and renewable energy sectors can reduce dependency on Chinese imports and even position India as an export hub. As global firms look to exit China, India must create the right tax, infrastructure, and regulatory environment to capture this shift. 

3. Use FTAs as Economic Leverage

India must tactically re-engage in bilateral and regional trade negotiations, particularly with ASEAN, Australia, and the EU, to dilute China’s influence on its trade mix. India’s exit from RCEP in 2019 was seen as protectionist, but new trade alignments can help create supply chain alternatives to China.

4. Seek a Bilateral Reset

While China calls for India to “stand together” against what it labels Trump’s “tariff abuse” (News18), India should strategically use this olive branch to demand more balanced trade practices. This could include easing non-tariff barriers for Indian exporters and greater reciprocity.

5. Engage in Global Trade Blocs: Tactically re-engaging in trade pacts can dilute Chinese influence. 

How Will It Help India Economically?

Reducing the Trade Deficit

Even a modest 10–15% increase in exports to China could reduce India’s annual trade deficit by $7–10 billion, easing pressure on the rupee and foreign reserves.

Boosting GDP Growth

Statista said India’s exports stood at $453 billion in FY2023. A trade realignment that increases market share in China could boost GDP growth by 0.2% to 0.3% annually through higher export volumes and job creation in sectors like textiles, electronics, and pharma.

Attracting Manufacturing FDI

India’s FDI in manufacturing hit $16.7 billion in FY2022 (DPIIT data). With global manufacturers relocating from China, India can double this inflow by 2026 if policy and infrastructure reforms keep pace. 

Benefits for China

  • Stable Alternative Markets: With the US becoming increasingly protectionist, India offers a large and growing consumer base. India’s projected middle-class population is expected to exceed 600 million by 2030, offering a robust demand environment for Chinese electronics, green tech, and machinery.
  • Supply Chain Integration: A recalibrated relationship with India allows China to diversify its supply chain risk, particularly in sourcing APIs, agricultural goods, and tech services. Collaboration in electric vehicles (EVs), solar energy, and smart manufacturing could help China cushion the loss of US demand.
  • Preserving Export Volumes: By tapping into the Indian market, China can mitigate the volume losses from shrinking access to the US. This helps maintain its industrial utilization rates, a critical factor for sustaining employment and avoiding domestic overcapacity.
  • Geopolitical Softening: An economic détente with India could reduce tensions along the LAC and provide a foundation for multilateral cooperation across BRICS and RCEP frameworks. Economic engagement may create a political buffer that stabilizes the region.

Challenges Ahead

While the opportunity is real, execution risks remain. Regulatory bottlenecks, bureaucratic delays, and inconsistent infrastructure policies may blunt India’s appeal. Moreover, China remains economically dominant in many critical inputs—meaning India’s transition will need careful pacing rather than abrupt shifts.

Geopolitical tensions, especially after incidents like the Galwan Valley clash, cast shadows over diplomatic engagement. However, economics has always had a way of recalibrating politics, especially when mutual benefits are clear.

Conclusion

The trade war between the US and China presents an opportunity for countries like India to reduce trade deficits and enhance their position in the global supply chain. While the conflict may seem restricted to the two countries, its impact is far-reaching. India must approach this situation with a pragmatic and strategic mindset. This is not only vital from an economic perspective, but also from a geopolitical standpoint.

Leading logistics company Delhivery has announced its acquisition of Ecom Express for ₹1,407 crore in an all-cash deal. While the transaction is significant in itself, the story behind it makes it more compelling. Once valued at nearly ₹7,000 crore, Ecom Express is now being acquired at an 80% discount. This shift reflects a downturn for one company and the changing dynamics of India’s startup and logistics ecosystem.

Here’s a breakdown of the deal, its structure, the reasons behind the valuation cut, what it means for Delhivery, and the larger signals it sends across the industry.

The Deal: What’s on the Table

Delhivery will acquire a 99.4% stake in Ecom Express in an all-cash deal. The deal provides a complete exit to Ecom Express’s current shareholders, including global investors like Warburg Pincus, CDC Group (British International Investment), Partners Group, and the company’s founders.

Delhivery had previously invested in Ecom Express in 2017 through its fund, making this an acquisition and a full-circle return on an earlier strategic bet. This deal also provides Delhivery with an immediate expansion of service capacity, especially in regions where Ecom Express has already built strong infrastructure. It creates opportunities for streamlining logistics operations and boosting last-mile delivery performance.

The deal’s structure also reflects a growing trend of companies using stock options with cash to preserve liquidity while securing strategic acquisitions. For Delhivery, this is a capital-efficient way to expand aggressively without overstretching financially. Source: Economic Times

Why the Valuation Drop?

The detail that stands out the most is the steep markdown from a ₹7,000 crore valuation in 2021 to ₹1,407 crore in 2024. A number of operational and market realities contributed to this:

  • Ecom Express lost its largest client, Amazon, which pulled back a significant portion of its business.
  • The company saw the exit of key leadership, including co-founder and CEO T.A. Krishnan.
  • Revenue growth remained largely flat, failing to keep pace with competitors.
  • With mounting costs and a challenging funding environment, existing investors hesitated to provide further capital.

As investor confidence weakened and internal momentum stalled, Ecom Express faced limited options. The decision to sell to Delhivery was likely the most viable outcome, offering stakeholders a complete exit and some value recovery.

Furthermore, as the e-commerce logistics market evolved, Ecom Express struggled to innovate or diversify its services. In contrast, competitors like Delhivery leveraged technology and data analytics to improve efficiency and gain market share, creating a clear gap in strategic positioning. Source: Economic Times

AD 4nXfeJq23
Source: Economic Times

Strategic Gains for Delhivery

For Delhivery, this acquisition isn’t just opportunistic—it’s strategic.

By acquiring Ecom Express, Delhivery gets:

  • Increased last-mile delivery capacity, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities
  • Stronger rural reach, helping the company serve customers in underpenetrated markets
  • Higher shipment volumes, especially in the fast-growing e-commerce segment
  • Operational synergies through the integration of delivery networks, hubs, and technology platforms

It also offers cost optimization opportunities. With overlapping delivery zones and infrastructure, Delhivery can consolidate operations, shut redundant facilities, and optimize manpower.

This is especially important in a sector where margins are thin, and efficiency often determines profitability. Delhivery is aiming to become a long-term profitable logistics company, and this acquisition supports that direction.

The move also allows Delhivery to neutralize competition by absorbing a former rival. With fewer players vying for the same contracts and customer base, Delhivery will likely gain pricing power, better contract terms, and increased share-of-wallet from enterprise clients.

Revenue: Flat Growth vs. Upward Momentum

The operating revenue figures are key data points that explain the deal’s rationale. While Delhivery and Blue Dart posted steady growth between FY2023 and FY2024, Ecom Express showed only a marginal increase:

AD 4nXdkGsPiG1M4Y0WmCKhxeMqMDIYCeGqJ8Vr i3P gWWSxERE0sPQdeFIpMujirk2N1U4jbYuB4ufNClVqq7Jv2ktaZXun7yL3J3aql BpwM9hd1DsVRypKJHOqC43KIlYqZTtV
Source: Economic Times

This flat growth underlines Ecom Express’s struggle to scale revenue in a rapidly expanding market, making Delhivery’s acquisition offer both timely and logical. Delhivery’s consistent revenue climb positions it as a consolidator with the financial muscle to absorb and revitalize underperforming players.

What This Means for the Industry

This acquisition isn’t just about two companies. It reflects a broader trend in Indian logistics and startup funding:

  • Consolidation is accelerating as market leaders buy out weaker or slower-growing peers
  • Profitability is being prioritized over high valuations
  • Private equity and venture capital are more cautious, especially in capital-heavy sectors
  • Publicly listed companies like Delhivery have an edge thanks to easier access to funding and deal-making tools

As investors increasingly demand returns and not just growth, companies are under pressure to rethink their business models. Asset-heavy firms like Ecom Express, without significant tech-driven differentiators or consistent revenue upticks, are becoming targets for buyouts rather than fresh capital.

What’s also becoming clear is that the logistics industry is no longer just about delivery; it’s about data, network intelligence, and the ability to adapt quickly. Companies like Delhivery that are betting on end-to-end integration and real-time tracking solutions are setting the pace for the future.

The Road Ahead for Delhivery

With the acquisition completed, Delhivery will begin integrating Ecom Express’s assets. This includes:

  • Unifying sorting centers, warehouses, and delivery fleets
  • Aligning technology platforms and back-end systems
  • Restructuring teams and roles for efficiency

  • Successful execution could lead to:
  • Lower cost-per-delivery through scale
  • Faster turnaround times
  • Better customer satisfaction metrics

However, integrations are never easy. Delhivery will need to carefully manage cultural alignment, system migrations, and operational disruptions to realize the benefits of this deal fully.

Conclusion

Delhivery’s acquisition of Ecom Express marks a turning point in India’s logistics story. It brings together two players in a rapidly evolving space but also highlights the hard truths facing startups today. The message is clear for founders and investors alike: valuations must be earned, not assumed.

As Delhivery strengthens its presence and works toward profitability, this deal could set the tone for more such consolidations in the near future. It also raises the bar for performance in logistics—where technology, efficiency, and adaptability determine who thrives and who exits.

FAQs

  1. Why did Ecom Express agree to a sale at such a low price?

    Due to operational struggles, leadership exits, funding constraints, and stagnant revenue, the company had limited options. A sale provided a clean exit for investors.

  2. What does Delhivery gain from this deal?

    Delhivery gets a wider reach, better infrastructure in rural India, and increased shipment volumes—all of which support its long-term growth plans.

  3. Will Ecom Express continue to operate under its name?

    No official announcement has been made, but full ownership suggests Ecom Express will likely be absorbed into Delhivery’s operations.

  4. How did the market respond to the deal?

    Delhivery’s shares saw a small increase post-announcement, indicating cautious optimism from investors.

  5. What does this deal signal for the future of logistics in India?

    It shows that growth alone isn’t enough. Companies must prove their ability to scale sustainably, manage costs, and deliver returns.

The effects of the US-declared sweeping tariffs were evident in the red zones that covered the market yesterday. However, positivity made a comeback today, 8th April 2025, and along with it brought a stock under the limelight- Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL).

BEL share price started the trading session with a jump of nearly 4% in the initial hours after the announcement of bagging a significant order from the Ministry of Defence (MoD). What was the announcement, and how did it affect the company’s share price? Let’s decode. 

The Announcement:

The Navratna PSU, Bharat Electronics Limited, on 8th April 2025, announced that it secured an order worth Rs.2210 crore from the Indian Air Force. The order is to supply an indigenously developed Electronic Warfare Suite for the IAF’s Mi-17 V5 helicopters. The suite includes a Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), a Missile Approach Warning System (MAWS), and a Counter Measure Dispensing System (CMDS). According to the company’s exchange filing, the EW suite has been designed by CASDIC and DRDO and will be manufactured by BEL.

With this order, BEL’s total order inflow for the current financial year (FY25) is Rs.2,803 crore. A few other orders during the year that contributed to the order book were

  • 14th March 2024: BEL entered a contract with Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) to supply 14 Communication and Electronic Warfare (EW) sensors and systems, which were agreed to be manufactured by BEL domestically. The contract was worth Rs.847.70 crore
  • 12th March 2025: Rs.2,463 crore order from MoD for the supply of Ashwini Radars for IAF
AD 4nXfFjiITrayZCERFlLOtV9UhgjTSz7H
Source: Annual Report 2023-24

Additionally, BEL signed another crucial contract worth Rs.593.22 crore with the IAF for the Akash Missile System maintenance services.

Effect Of The Announcement:

Over the years, every announcement of a new order or project by BEL has garnered a positive reaction from the market towards its shares. Even this time, the BEL share price reached an intraday high of Rs.288 and jumped nearly 4% in the initial trading hours after the announcement of the new IAF order. 

Source: Money Control

As of 8th April 2025, the stock has given a return of 25.16% in the past year and 250.19% in the past three years. 

Overview Of Bharat Electronics Limited:

Established in 1954, BEL is a leading Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) under the Ministry of Defence, specializing in designing, manufacturing, and supplying advanced electronic equipment and systems primarily for the defense sector. The company was conferred with the Navratna status in 2007 and with a strong presence across 29 strategic business units (SBUs) – including Cybersecurity, Unmanned Systems, and Arms & Ammunition – BEL’s defense segment contributed 81% to its revenue in FY24, marking steady execution and innovation. 

AD 4nXfyKqeNkCeitAhVfCbQhaUiGxSOf PXA3
Source: Annual Report 2023-24

BEL is also tapping into global opportunities. Its exports – ranging from radar modules to communication systems – grew over 236% between FY22 and FY24, making up 4% of its revenue. The company has set up overseas marketing offices in Oman, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka while expanding operations in Singapore and New York, reflecting its ambitions to become a global defense player.

As of July 2024, BEL has signed strategic MoUs with domestic and international players, including AAI, Delhi Metro, IISC, Rosoboronexport (Russia), and Reliasat Inc. (Canada). The company operates nine manufacturing units across India, with major facilities in Bangalore and Ghaziabad. It invested Rs.650 crore in capex during FY24 to further focus on new plants and modernization.

BEL has kept innovation central to its growth, with 7% of its revenue consistently plowed into R&D. The company also drives Indigenous development – contributing to 77% of its revenue from in-house products. With 1,199 IPRs filed and 40 new products introduced in FY24, BEL continues to evolve, embracing new business models and forming joint ventures, such as the newly formed BEL IAI AeroSystems Pvt. Ltd. with Israel Aerospace Industries. 

Source: Annual Report And Press Release

Financial Overview:

As of FY2024, BEL has followed a consistent pattern of increasing revenue over the past five fiscal years.

AD 4nXec19vZr3RxI7glPdag0zGW07M7 AmD7ezrPeiy6J9J hrXXF n1mUuAuKsUDOCNOr2elqV p4uRS8h1nEoer QyCVZ1BQEUvhoZBqGxI5zhRL7B46rIkZQct Qaqw09b3nzp V5A?key=LX TlggtokejJvQBPUaALjlR
Source: Financial Statements

The company’s year-on-year revenue growth rates were 6% in FY20, 8.9% in FY22, 15.22% in FY23, and 16.23% in FY24. Multiple factors contributed to this trend, including the execution of orders from its order book, increased demand in the defense sector, and diversification into non-defense and export markets.

For FY2024, the company’s revenue reached Rs.20268.24 crore, of which the net profit was Rs.3985.24 crore, with the PAT margin being 20%. Additionally, the consistent expansion and profits have kept the net worth positive, reaching Rs.16,082 crore in FY2024. 

Takeaway For Investors:

Bharat Electronics Limited has reported consistent revenue growth over the last five financial years, supported by a strong order book and a steady stream of contracts from defense and non-defense segments. The company has consistently maintained its presence in core defence electronics while gradually expanding its reach in civilian markets and exports. Its operational scale, R&D investments, and ongoing capital expenditure reflect its intent to sustain long-term capabilities.

Conclusion:

While recent developments and financial performance highlight BEL’s role in India’s defense ecosystem, investment decisions should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of the company’s fundamentals, market conditions, and individual risk appetite. It is thus suggested that before investing, you conduct your due diligence or consult financial experts to make the most suitable choice for your portfolio.

When Donald Trump floated the idea of a 10% universal import tariff—and as much as 60% on Chinese goods—it wasn’t just a campaign headline. It reopened a long-standing debate: can aggressive protectionism trigger the next global recession?

With inflation still sticky, monetary policy stretched, and geopolitical tensions high, this is more than a U.S. election-year stunt. It’s a policy shift with global consequences. To unpack whether tariffs will push economies into recession, we must understand the transmission mechanisms—from price levels and investment behavior to currency shocks and global demand.

Tariffs: A Tax with Long Tails

Tariffs are often portrayed as a tool to protect domestic industry. But economically, they are regressive taxes. They raise the cost of imported goods, which then filters into:

  • Consumer prices (higher inflation)
  • Corporate margins (especially for firms relying on global supply chains)
  • Investment behavior (uncertainty discourages capex)
  • Exports (due to retaliation)

According to the Tax Foundation, a 10% universal tariff would mean a $300 billion tax increase for U.S. consumers over 10 years. That’s more than the annual GDP of countries like Portugal or New Zealand.

Moreover, as per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, tariffs during the 2018–2019 U.S.-China trade war raised input costs for manufacturers by 8%, contributing to a significant slowdown in factory orders and capital expenditure.

Could It Tip the U.S. Into Recession?

A U.S. recession isn’t a theoretical possibility—it’s a statistical probability if tariffs rise drastically in an already fragile macro environment.

Here’s how the dominoes may fall:

  1. Higher Prices = Delayed Rate Cuts
    According to Oxford Economics, a 10% import tariff is expected to add 1.8 to 2 percentage points to inflation. This may force the Federal Reserve to hold interest rates above 5% well into 2026, suppressing consumption and borrowing.
  2. Demand Shock + Investment Freeze
    With higher prices and interest rates, household spending and corporate investment would decline. As of Q1 2025, actual personal consumption is already slowing, growing at just 1.2% YoY, down from 2.7% a year ago.
  3. Trade Retaliation and Global Rebalancing
    The EU and China have already hinted at reciprocal tariffs. This reduces demand for U.S. exports, leading to a drop in production, especially in industrial and agri-export hubs like the Midwest.
  4. Unemployment Creeps Up
    Manufacturing job growth in the U.S. is already stalling—March 2025 added only 5,000 manufacturing jobs, down from a monthly average of 18,000 in 2023. With rising input costs, job cuts may follow. 

The U.S. economy is walking a tightrope, and broad tariffs could tip the balance.

The Global Fallout: Who’s Most Vulnerable?

1. China

Trump’s proposed 60% tariff on Chinese goods would further destabilize China’s export sector, which already saw a 6.5% YoY drop in shipments to the U.S. in 2024. The shock would weaken the yuan, trigger capital flight, and potentially force Beijing to boost fiscal stimulus.

  • Export-to-GDP Ratio (China): 21% (Statista)
  • % of Exports to the U.S.: ~17%

2. Germany & the EU

Germany, Europe’s manufacturing engine, exports nearly 50% of its GDP. If global demand weakens, the eurozone may slide into recession again following 2023’s near-zero growth. Sectors like autos and machinery would be hit hard.

  • Germany’s Exports to the U.S.: ~$157 billion (2024)
  • Dependency on global demand: Extremely high due to low domestic consumption. 

3. Southeast Asia & Mexico 

Vietnam, Taiwan, and Mexico are key parts of global supply chains. For instance, Vietnam sends 28% of its total exports to the U.S. A slowdown in U.S. demand would ripple into factory closures and currency volatility.   

AD 4nXfLtRoQD5vI2uzBJjCr5FpMld29Z VQXrQhwpH5IJ8imdDJQERQyKkifObjnUpbwTRLeEpSx5Phq0h 5BKj8ktHil 8qz Y3GnmD5HDgddgg3so4qBrlnPvDxPnhszWPaPTjSEL?key=xW0gwMZBErA

Source: Statista, World Bank, WTO Trade Data 

4. Commodity Exporters

Tariff-driven demand slowdown in industrial nations would also reduce demand for commodities. Countries like Brazil (soybeans), Australia (iron ore), and South Africa (metals) may face lower prices and revenue shortfalls.

Is This 2018 All Over Again?

In many ways, no. The macro backdrop today is more fragile. Global interest rates were near zero during the 2018-2019 trade war. Central banks had room to cut. Today, most are already in tightening or neutral mode. It limits monetary flexibility to cushion the blow.

Also, corporate balance sheets are more fragile, especially in China and Europe. Global corporate debt as a percentage of GDP rose 102% in 2024, up from 89% in 2019.

Is India Vulnerable to a Global Recession?

Yes, but with caveats.
India is not immune to a global recession but is better insulated than many other emerging markets. 

AD 4nXcUd86hVIN8o7kOh5Jral fi2DqHHKMaYdb fY5P0LNKIxAFA22t NuCCcBsybuaDw5KjohzDix5VZbGs6qRXRJyRmZgbo0jV jxWmL 714d1tCR9Ckzrnj0 oTpeqp4oJWRWiG?key=xW0gwMZBErA

Here’s why:

Factors That Shield India

  1. Domestic Demand-Driven Economy
    Unlike export-heavy nations (like Vietnam or Germany), India’s GDP is driven ~60% by domestic consumption, which acts as a buffer.
  2. Services Resilience
    India’s IT and business services sector (~8% of GDP) remains globally competitive and essential, even in downturns. Many global firms outsource more during recessions to cut costs, which benefits India.
  3. Healthy Forex Reserves
    As of March 2025, India has $640 billion in forex reserves, giving it room to manage currency volatility and imports.
  4. Macroeconomic Management
    Inflation, while sticky, has been moderating. The RBI has built credibility in balancing growth and inflation, and fiscal policy is relatively conservative compared to peers. 

Risks and Vulnerabilities

  1. Export Exposure to the U.S. & EU
    While exports are only ~20% of India’s GDP, the U.S. and EU account for 30% of India’s total exports. A slowdown there would hit sectors like textiles, engineering goods, and software services.
  2. Oil Prices and Capital Flows
    In a global slowdown, oil prices might initially fall, but if geopolitical tensions rise (say, in the Middle East), prices may spike, hurting India’s import bill. Also, FII outflows often increase during global stress.
  3. Unemployment & Informal Sector Stress
    A global slowdown can impact job creation, especially in export-oriented SMEs and gig economy sectors. This could widen income inequality. 

Economic Consequences of a Global Recession

A full-blown global recession can create first-order and second-order effects:  

ConsequencesImpact
Demand ContractionReduced sales for exports, lower revenues
Investment FreezeDelay in FDI, private sector capex cuts
Employment StressJob losses in trade-exposed and IT sectors
Fiscal StrainGovernment spending may rise to support jobs
Credit RisksDefaults may rise in MSME and retail loans
Currency VolatilityINR depreciation due to capital outflows

Is There a Silver Lining to a Recession?

Yes. Recessions, while painful, can reset imbalances and offer structural opportunities. Here’s how:

1. India as an Alternative to China

Global firms seeking “China Plus One” diversification may accelerate supply chain moves to India, especially in electronics, pharmaceuticals, and renewable energy. For instance:

  • Apple now assembles 12–14% of its iPhones in India (Source: Bloomberg, 2025). 
  • India’s PLI (Production Linked Incentive) schemes could attract more investment during shifts. 

2. Lower Global Commodity Prices 

A global recession typically reduces demand for oil, metals, and agri-products. For India, which imports over 80% of its crude, this means lower inflation and improved trade balance—freeing up space for fiscal support or rate cuts.

3. Tech & Talent Outsourcing Boom 

As global companies cut costs, India’s tech services may see a surge in demand. During the 2008 recession, Indian IT firms like TCS and Infosys grew faster than the global average.

4. Policy Reforms Under Pressure

Recessions often force governments to act boldly. India may push forward:

  • Labor market reforms 
  • Infrastructure investment
  • Trade diversification
  • Easing compliance for MSMEs 

What Can Be Done to Avoid a Recession?

  1. Targeted Tariffs, Not Blanket Measures
    Instead of a universal tariff, a nuanced approach focusing on strategic goods (e.g., EVs, semiconductors) could protect domestic interests without stoking a global shock.
  2. Supply Chain Diversification
    For businesses, shifting procurement to India, Indonesia, or Latin America could help reduce dependence on tariff-prone geographies. The “China Plus One” strategy is gaining ground.
  3. International Trade Coordination
    Platforms like the WTO, G7, and APEC must play a bigger role in mediating disputes. The world can’t afford another full-blown trade war.
  4. Fiscal Policy Readiness
    Governments must keep fiscal stimulus tools ready—especially in export-reliant nations. Support to vulnerable sectors and households could soften the landing.

Tariffs, Recession, and Risk Multipliers

Trade policy is not made in a vacuum. In 2025, the world is still absorbing the aftershocks of a pandemic, a war in Eastern Europe, and tight monetary policy. Trump’s tariff ambitions may offer political dividends—but economically, they risk pushing the U.S. and the world toward a recession.

If protectionist policies gain traction without complementary buffers—such as diplomacy, diversification, and smart monetary coordination—the odds of a global downturn increase sharply. 

Tata Group is gearing up for one of its largest fundraising efforts in recent years. It is set to raise $1.3 billion to boost its digital platforms, BigBasket, and 1mg, as part of its broader strategy to strengthen its presence in the fast-growing quick commerce segment. This substantial funding will support BigBasket’s transition towards faster delivery services and enable 1mg to scale its healthcare offerings. Source: Economic Times

The initiative aligns with Tata Digital’s ambitious growth plans to enhance competitiveness and expand its footprint in the evolving digital marketplace.

Let’s dive into how this ambitious move could reshape the Indian digital landscape and what it means for the quick commerce and digital healthcare sectors.

A Strategic Fundraising Drive

Backed by Tata Digital, the plan is to raise $1.3 billion from external investors to strengthen BigBasket and Tata 1mg. Out of this,  $1 billion will be channeled into BigBasket, while Tata 1mg will receive $300 million. Global investment banks Citi and Moelis have been brought on board to make this happen. These financial heavyweights will help secure funding from reputed investors like Canadian pension funds and sovereign wealth funds from Asia, including Temasek. Source: Economic Times

Strong Growth Forecast for Quick Commerce Market

Before diving into more details, let’s look at the overall scenario of the Quick Commerce Market. The market is poised for significant expansion, with revenue expected to reach US$5.38 billion in 2025. Between 2025 and 2029, the market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.60%, reaching a total market volume of approximately US$9.95 billion by 2029.  Source: Statista

AD 4nXeAkvzTEonyc0POrEhoeyKKf5v9ori4 AEmlzNcIlnxBGJO0Vi6cbTl1 GP GaYDAaBYu
Source: Statista

The number of users is also set to rise, with estimates suggesting 60.6 million users by 2029. User penetration is projected to increase from 2.7% in 2025 to 4.0% by 2029, and the average revenue per user (ARPU) is expected to be around US$137.20. On a global scale, China will lead the market with an estimated revenue of US$92.68 billion in 2025 and the highest user penetration rate at 23.9%, highlighting its dominant position in the Quick Commerce landscape. Source: Statista

Why BigBasket Needs the Big Bucks

BigBasket, once known mainly for its scheduled grocery deliveries, is now making a big pivot toward quick commerce – a space currently dominated by Zepto and Blinkit. Quick commerce promises delivery in minutes, and BigBasket has slowly adapted. During a recent business review, Tata Sons expressed dissatisfaction with BigBasket’s sluggish pace.

The new funds are expected to help BigBasket rapidly expand in this space, revamp its infrastructure, and improve speed. While the company has held a more cautious approach to cash-burning quick delivery models, the competitive pressure has forced a change in strategy.

BigBasket’s quick commerce wing, BB Now, is being repositioned as a multi-category platform. Plans are underway to integrate it with other Tata brands like Croma (electronics), Zudio (fashion), CaratLane (jewelry), and Tata 1mg itself. This is a strategic move to drive synergy within Tata Neu, the company’s super app.

A Glimpse at the Numbers

Despite stiff competition, BigBasket still stands tall in some areas. 

  • Its average order value is around ₹850-860 – significantly higher than that of Blinkit or Zepto. In FY24, the company posted a 6.27% increase in revenue, touching ₹10,061.9 crore. Losses decreased by over 20%, showing the company is inching closer to profitability.
  • For FY25, BigBasket has set an ambitious sales target of ₹12,400 crore. To meet this goal, it plans to grow its dark store network to 700 by summer and expand deeper into Tier II, III, and IV cities. Source: Economic Times

Digital Healthcare Gets a Boost with Tata 1mg

Tata 1mg, the group’s digital healthcare platform, is the second primary beneficiary of this fundraising push. With $300 million allocated, the focus will be on expanding its offerings – from online pharmacy to diagnostics and express deliveries.

Since becoming a Tata entity in June 2021, 1mg has been building its physical presence and increasing its logistics capabilities. In Delhi-NCR, for instance, 1mg offers four-to-five-hour deliveries and even 30-minute express options for selected products.

Its performance has also been promising. Revenue grew by 20% in FY24, reaching ₹1,968 crore. Even more impressively, losses shrank by 75% to ₹313 crore. These are strong indicators that the platform is on the path to profitability. Source: Economic Times

Ownership and Valuation

Let’s take a quick look at who owns what:

  • BigBasket: Tata Group owns over 65%, while other key investors include Mirae Asset Venture Capital and the UK-based CDC Group. The platform was last valued at $3.2 billion.
  • Tata 1mg: Tata Digital owns around 63%, with the rest held by investors like Sequoia Capital, Intel Capital, Omidyar Network, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The last known valuation was $1.25 billion (2022).

This shows that both platforms already have strong backing but need fresh funds to take on more aggressive players.

Neu Superapp: The Bigger Game Plan

All these moves are part of Tata’s broader strategy around its Neu superapp. Tata Sons has poured over $2 billion into this digital platform, but it has yet to deliver the expected returns. This new push indicates a renewed focus on creating a one-stop digital ecosystem, combining groceries, healthcare, electronics, fashion, and more.

The consolidation of BBdaily into BigBasket’s main app is another move in this direction. It simplifies the customer experience and aligns better with Neu’s multi-category goals.

Challenges on the Horizon

The quick commerce market is a tough nut to crack. High delivery costs, customer expectations for lightning-fast service, and low margins make it a complex business.

According to market experts, quick commerce giants like Blinkit, Zepto, and BB Now are now targeting smaller towns to reduce competition. Tier I cities have become saturated, and players are eyeing Tier II+ cities, which remain underserved.

Similarly, the digital pharmacy space in India still accounts for just 3-5% of the overall healthcare market, compared to 20% in developed economies. This indicates a massive opportunity and the need for regulatory navigation and customer education. Source: Economic Times

Investor Sentiment and IPO Talks

While this fundraising round draws investor interest, not everyone is completely sold on the valuation expectations. Some investors are considering an exit, although an IPO for BigBasket isn’t on the immediate cards.

Some investors are looking for liquidity, and the backing of Tata Sons provides a sense of security. However, investors expect performance, and the funding tap won’t stay open forever. Tata Sons has emphasized profitability and accountability.

Is Quick Commerce the Future?

Experts believe the 10-minute delivery model stays here, but only the fittest will survive. They believe offering a wide selection, fast delivery, and competitive pricing is an incredibly challenging mix. Billions in funding don’t guarantee success unless operations are run with precision and customer loyalty is earned. Quick commerce now makes up 80% of BigBasket’s orders, holding just a 10% market share. 

What Lies Ahead

Tata Group’s $1.3 billion fundraising plan is more than just a financial move. It signals a bold shift in how the group wants to compete in the rapidly evolving digital economy.

For BigBasket, the money will fuel its transformation from a scheduled delivery service to a serious quick commerce contender. For Tata 1mg, it means more substantial logistics, better customer service, and a larger market share in digital healthcare.

With a seasoned brand like Tata behind them and strategic integration under the Neu superapp, both platforms can expect growth in the future. But they’ll need to innovate constantly, manage costs wisely, and win over customers in an increasingly competitive space.

FAQs

  1. Why are BigBasket and 1mg receiving a $1.3 billion cash infusion? 

    This funding aims to boost their competitiveness, especially in the quick commerce sector for BigBasket, and expanded healthcare services for 1mg, supporting Tata Digital’s growth ambitions.

  2. How much funding will each company receive? 

    BigBasket is earmarked to receive $1 billion, primarily to fuel its expansion in quick delivery services. Online pharmacy 1mg will receive the remaining $300 million for healthcare service growth.

  3. What is BigBasket’s strategy with this new capital? 

    BigBasket will use the funds to expand its quick commerce capabilities aggressively, integrate with other Tata Neu categories, and increase its dark store network to 700 locations, including smaller cities.

  4. How will 1mg utilize the $300 million investment?

    1mg plans to invest in strengthening its physical presence and expanding its quick delivery services for medicines and healthcare products, aiming to increase its market share in online pharmacy.

  5. What does this cash surge indicate about Tata’s digital strategy?


    It highlights Tata’s commitment to aggressively compete in the e-commerce and digital healthcare space, focusing on rapid growth and integrating its digital assets under the Tata Neu umbrella.

You were probably shocked if you opened your trading app this morning expecting business as usual.  The Indian stock market opened deep in the red on Monday, April 7, aligning with global market weakness. The Nifty 50 crashed below the 21,800 level, and the Sensex followed closely, plunging by nearly 4,000 points in early trade. 

Nervousness swept through Dalal Street within minutes of the opening bell. The broader market took an even bigger hit, and by mid-morning, nearly ₹19 lakh crore had been wiped off investor wealth. So what exactly happened? Let’s examine the five key reasons behind the meltdown and unpack the layers that led to such a sharp fall.

A Snapshot of the Market Chaos 

Let’s first take stock of what went down:

  • At 7:20 am, the GIFT Nifty quoted 22,130 — down over 900 points or 3.6%.
  • Around 9:15 am, the Nifty 50 opened at 21,758.40, down 1,146.05 points from its previous closing of 22,904.45 or 5%.
  • The Sensex was down 2,752 points or 3.65%, sitting at 72,613.
  • BSE Midcap index dropped over 8% to 37,203.21.
  • BSE Smallcap index tanked 10.5%, hitting a low of 41,013.68.
  • India’s VIX surged by 54.98%, climbing to 21.32 — reflecting an extremely high level of fear.
  • The total market capitalization of BSE-listed companies fell from ₹403 lakh crore to ₹384 lakh crore.

This was one of the sharpest single-day erosions of investor wealth in recent times. Source: MoneyControl 

AD 4nXceL0KQIPpqoReQ JaU kUEjHJ8p1gP2mO Ag rNkDuQwpD3m1r9K mJiXPRLbTyR fyxKNMtpy1weuA53Ec7pDuwyfJSelWwzZHFIhrM7YRK89BszU5yZorw0EE6e4wePiIJhVoQ?key=3IdjCfnKpJw9JSN MtOOv3nf
Source: NSE

1. Global Selloff Triggered by U.S. Tariff Spree

The most immediate cause of the crash was the ripple effect of global selloffs. Over the weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated his commitment to reciprocal tariffs, even calling them “medicine” necessary to fix long-standing trade issues. His statement, “I don’t want anything to go down. But sometimes you must take medicine to fix something” — set off alarm bells globally.

Major global indices reflected the damage:

  • On Friday, the S&P 500 dropped 5.97%.
  • Dow Jones fell 5.50%.
  • Nasdaq lost 5.73%.
  • On Monday, Asia followed suit — the Taiwan Weighted index fell 10%, and Japan’s Nikkei dropped 7%.
  • With global investors fleeing riskier assets, Indian markets were bound to catch the fallout. When global markets bleed, domestic sentiment tends to follow.

2. Tariff Impact Still Not Fully Priced In

Even though markets have been aware of the U.S. administration’s tariff moves, there’s a growing belief that the full impact isn’t yet reflected in equity prices. The Trump administration’s latest move involves sweeping tariffs across 180 countries, creating renewed uncertainty.

Brokerage firm Emkay Global noted that the direct impact on India may be limited, but a broader U.S. recession could reduce FY26 Nifty EPS by around 3%. If earnings expectations are slashed, the valuation rerating could drag the Nifty down further — potentially toward 21,500 levels.

Markets typically price in known risks, but fresh panic sets in when those risks escalate or timelines shift — as we saw today.
Source: Livemint

3. Fears of a Global Growth Slowdown

Trade wars rarely end well for global growth, and that fear is now front and center.

After the U.S. imposed fresh tariffs on April 2, China retaliated with 34% additional tariffs on American goods. This tit-for-tat escalation raised alarm over a global economic slowdown.

According to a Reuters report, JPMorgan raised the probability of a U.S. and global recession from 40% to 60%. Bruce Kasman, head of economics at JPMorgan, warned that if sustained, these trade policies could “tip a still healthy U.S. and global expansion into recession.”

For India, while the direct tariff impact may be smaller, ripple effects can’t be ignored. Global demand softens, exports shrink, corporate profits get squeezed, and GDP forecasts are slashed.

In response to the new tariffs, Goldman Sachs revised India’s growth forecast for FY26 from 6.3% to 6.1%. Citi predicted a 40 basis point hit, and QuantEco Research estimated a 30 basis point impact on the Indian economy. Source: Livemint

4. Foreign Portfolio Investors Resume Selling

April began with a shift in foreign investor behavior. After net buying in March, foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) turned sellers again. By Friday, FPIs had sold ₹13,730 crore worth of Indian equities in the cash segment. This reversal is driven by the uncertainty around the global macro outlook and concerns that India could face the brunt of foreign capital flight if the U.S. recession materializes.

There’s also anxiety around whether India can manage a favorable trade equation with the U.S. If not, that could further spook foreign investors who are already jittery about valuations and growth risks.

5. RBI Policy and Earnings Season Add to Caution

Two major domestic events this week have added to the cautious mood:

  • The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee is set to announce its decision on April 9. Markets are unsure whether the RBI will cut rates or introduce other supportive measures to bolster growth.
  • Q4 earnings season kicks off with TCS reporting on April 10. Investors are not just focused on the numbers but also on forward-looking commentary — especially from sectors like IT, which have significant exposure to the U.S. economy. Given the broader uncertainty, investors may move into a wait-and-watch mode until clearer cues emerge.

The Broader Market Tells the Story

The damage wasn’t limited to the large caps. Broader indices faced deeper cuts, with BSE Midcap and Smallcap indices crashing over 8% and 10.5%, respectively. The advance-decline ratio was a bleak 1:10 — meaning that ten were falling for every one stock rising. All 13 sectoral indices on the NSE ended in the red.

AD 4nXeQLv3Myx2wT 5TV4jgRKKytUnRBO6F5UbqXcj0SmtsRVUqelXtAjwfK8ROGz7rKoa 3eNJJZhzPPsda3DE MiNXcLmh0Autn8cXiQSScpzochmjj22ObWcc dzRpID7EXShljyw?key=3IdjCfnKpJw9JSN MtOOv3nf
Source: BSE

Among the worst hit were:

  • Nifty Metal, due to fears of falling industrial demand.
  • Nifty IT, owing to its dependence on U.S. revenues.
  • Even defensive sectors like FMCG and pharma, typically safer in volatile times, saw significant losses.

Source: Livemint

Conclusion 

Today’s market crash was a reminder of how quickly sentiment can turn when global and domestic factors collide. While some of the concerns — like tariffs and FPI behavior — have been on the radar for a while, the scale of today’s drop suggests investors are now pricing for sustained economic disruption.

Volatility looks set to stay elevated, at least in the short term, as markets navigate a complex mix of geopolitics, macroeconomic data, and earnings updates. For now, April 7 will go down as one of the most volatile sessions in recent memory. 

As the U.S. tightens its grip on trade with sweeping tariff policies aimed at reshoring jobs, India is witnessing a hiring boom that no tariff can touch. In 2025, India will become the world’s preferred destination for white-collar outsourcing, drawing in roles from IT, finance, R&D, and HR—even as its Western counterparts struggle with layoffs and sluggish growth.

From JPMorgan to Mondelez, global giants are expanding operations in India—not just to cut costs but to tap into a growing, skilled workforce that is increasingly critical to their global ambitions.

India’s White-Collar Boom

India’s Global Capability Centers (GCCs)—offshore offices handling technology, business, and operational processes for multinational companies—are multiplying. The sector employed 1.9 million people in 2023, which is expected to surpass 2.5 million by 2026, according to data from NASSCOM

GCC Employment in India (2020–2026E)

Source: NASSCOM, ETtech 

India added over 400,000 white-collar jobs in 2024 alone across software development, data science, cybersecurity, and operations. Traditional sectors like consumer goods and banking actively recruit from India for global functions.

What’s Driving India’s Hiring Binge?

1. Cost Efficiency Still Matters—but It’s Not Just About Cost Anymore

Yes, cost is still a factor. Hiring a software engineer in India costs roughly 70% less than in the U.S., according to Statista. But what’s changed is the value derived per dollar. Indian talent is now seen as not just affordable—but indispensable.

Companies like Goldman Sachs and Walmart have increased their headcount in India by 15–25% in the last year, not only in tech roles but in product design, data analysis, and R&D.

2. India’s Digital-First Workforce

India produces 1.5 million engineers annually, the highest in the world, and ranks second in the global developer base, per Statista.

This massive talent pool is digitally native, English-speaking, and skilled in next-gen technologies—from AI to blockchain. According to a report by McKinsey, India accounts for 30% of global data analytics talent.

3. Shift Toward Operational Resilience

The COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing geopolitical tensions have prompted companies to diversify risk away from single-country operations. India is emerging as the go-to destination for building resilient, decentralized teams.

The New York Times reported that over 1,600 multinationals now have GCCs in India, and over 50 new centers are expected to open in 2025 alone.

4. Tariffs Are Hitting Goods, Not Services

The Trump-era tariffs—and their continued legacy—mainly target physical imports and exports, not services. As India specializes in exporting intellectual labor, this sector remains largely immune to trade sanctions.

Moreover, U.S. firms are increasingly “in-shoring” services to their Indian GCCs, bypassing third-party vendors to reduce costs and boost control—effectively making tariffs irrelevant in this segment.

From Cost Arbitrage to Core Strategy

Unlike the early 2000s, when outsourcing was about cutting costs, today’s wave of hiring in India is deeply strategic. Companies are building centers of excellence here.

  • Mondelez International runs global R&D for products across Asia and Africa from India.
  • JPMorgan’s India GCC supports 80% of its tech operations globally.
  • PepsiCo’s GCC in Hyderabad handles analytics, finance, and digital transformation projects.

In short, India is no longer the back office—it’s the nerve center.

A Tale of Two Economies: U.S. vs. India

While India adds white-collar jobs at scale, the U.S. continues to shed tech and corporate roles. As of Q1 2025:

  • Google, Amazon, and Meta have cut over 70,000 jobs since 2023.
  • In contrast, Accenture, Deloitte, and PwC are hiring in India for global digital and AI roles.

Global Hiring Trends (2023–2025) 

RegionNet Job Additions (White Collar)
India+450,000
U.S.– 125000
Europe-40000
SEA+80000


Source: Layoffs.fyi, Naukri JobSpeak Index

Risks to Watch: What Could Disrupt the Hiring Surge?

While India’s white-collar hiring spree looks unstoppable, several underlying risks could slow the momentum. These aren’t immediate roadblocks but long-term fault lines that could dent India’s global back office and innovation hub position.

1. Skills Mismatch in Emerging Technologies

India’s talent pool is large but not uniformly skilled. While over 1.5 million engineers graduate yearly, only 35–40% are considered employable in high-end digital roles like AI, machine learning, and cybersecurity (Aspiring Minds, Statista).

  • According to a 2024 report by NASSCOM, India needs over 1.4 million professionals skilled in GenAI and data science by 2027—but is on track to fall short by at least 25–30%.
  • The World Economic Forum has highlighted that India’s education system is still catching up with industry requirements in automation, AI, and green tech.

2. Rising Wage Inflation and Urban Cost Pressures

India’s cost advantage is narrowing in top-tier cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Gurugram. Wage inflation in tech roles has averaged 9–11% annually, outpacing other emerging economies.

  • For mid-to-senior tech roles, salary costs in India are now 60–70% of U.S. levels, compared to 40–50% a decade ago (Mercer India 2024 report).
  • Real estate costs in tech corridors are up 15–20% YoY, pressuring GCCs to move to Tier-2 cities—where infrastructure and talent pipelines may not be equally robust.

3. Attrition and Talent Wars

India’s tech sector is infamous for high churn. Even post-pandemic, voluntary attrition rates hover at 18–22%, especially in in-demand fields like DevOps, cloud engineering, and product management (TeamLease, 2025).

  • GCCs often compete directly with Indian IT majors (like Infosys and TCS) and startups for the same talent pool.
  • Startups offer ESOPs and flexibility; traditional firms offer brand prestige—resulting in continuous poaching and inflated compensation packages.

4. Policy and Regulatory Friction

While India has improved significantly on the Ease of Doing Business Index, regulatory risks are far from gone:

  • Data localization laws may increase compliance burdens for firms handling sensitive international data (like banking or health records).
  • Taxation policy changes—including ongoing debate on equalization levies and digital services taxes—could make India less attractive as a services export base.
  • IP protection and patent enforcement still lag behind global standards, making R&D-heavy firms cautious about full-scale innovation hubs in India.

5. Geopolitical Realignments and Protectionism

India has been a beneficiary of “China+1” strategies—but that doesn’t make it immune to geopolitical backlash.

  • A shift in U.S. leadership or rising nationalist sentiment globally could push for onshoring of high-value digital jobs, just as manufacturing was brought back home.
  • Immigration policy changes in Western markets may also restrict Indian executives from rotating through global HQs, impacting knowledge transfer and long-term global integration.

Moreover, global regulatory frameworks like OECD’s Pillar Two (minimum corporate tax) could impact how GCCs are structured financially.

6. Infrastructure Gaps in Tier-2 Cities

As costs rise in Tier-1 cities, many companies are exploring Tier-2 locations like Coimbatore, Jaipur, and Nagpur. While cheaper, these cities often lack:

  • Plug-and-play tech parks
  • Reliable power and internet
  • Talent density and diversity
  • Urban amenities that attract high-quality talent

This limits scale, especially for firms planning centers of excellence in complex domains like fintech or AI.

Summing It Up: Scaling Is Not the Same as Sustaining

India’s white-collar boom is real—but sustaining it will require a multi-stakeholder approach:

  • Policy support for skilling, infrastructure, and IP
  • Private sector investment in Tier-2 ecosystem building
  • Academic reform to match industry needs
  • Stable regulation that supports innovation, not just compliance

As global demand for digital and operational excellence rises, India is at a pole position. But to hold that lead, it must evolve beyond cost advantage and build a sustainable, resilient, and value-driven employment ecosystem.

Think about the last time you took a flight or drove past a petrol pump. Have you ever wondered how that fuel gets there? It’s not magic—it’s shipping. And when it comes to shipping, one homegrown giant has been steering the industry for over 75 years.

Centuries ago, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the Father of the Indian Navy, understood that true power wasn’t just on land—it was on the seas. As India approached independence, a new battle for maritime dominance was unfolding. Visionary entrepreneurs saw beyond the tide, refusing to let India remain a mere passenger in global trade. 

What started as a simple commodity business soon became a force that would reclaim India’s place on the seas and shape its maritime destiny for generations.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 02

That Sparked A Shipping Empire

Mumbai, early 1900s—where the scent of salt met the spice of ambition. Among the bustling docks and roaring trade markets, two brothers,

Jagjiwan and Maneklal Mulji, saw something others didn’t: the tides of opportunity. But before they set sail on their shipping dreams, their story began with something much sweeter—sugar.

The duo ran Jagjiwan Ujamshi Mulji and Company, importing sugar from Java to India on their chartered steamers. Business was booming, but the real revelation wasn’t in the sweetness of their cargo—it was in the cost of getting it here. 

At the time, freight rates stood at a hefty Rs. 27 per ton. The brothers, ever the strategists, brought it down to just Rs. 10 per ton using their chartered steamers. This was their “first blood”—the moment they realized the power of shipping.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 03

A Bold Move That Reshaped Shipping

But just as their sails caught the wind, the 1930s came crashing with the Great Depression. Trade slowed, businesses crumbled, and even the sharpest entrepreneurs found themselves struggling hard. 

The Mulji brothers weren’t about to sink. Instead, they turned to a prominent Bombay business family—the Bhiwandiwallas. With no money but an unshakable belief in their skills, they made a pitch: invest in us, and we’ll multiply your wealth. 

The Bhiwandiwallas took the bet. And just like that, Ardeshir Hormusji Bhiwandiwalla and Company was born—a partnership that would forever change India’s shipping industry.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 04

India’s Maritime Independence

With their new backers, the brothers expanded aggressively. They acquired more vessels, built stronger trading networks, and positioned themselves as key players in India’s maritime trade.

But their greatest test was yet to come. As whispers of war and independence grew louder, shipping became its battleground.

British shipping giants dominated Indian waters, controlling freight costs and dictating terms. Indian traders were at their mercy—until the Mulji brothers and their partners decided to fight back. 

They expanded their fleet, securing contracts once considered impossible for Indian businesses. Every voyage was a statement: India wasn’t just a market; it was a contender.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 05

The Birth of an Indian Shipping Giant

By the time independence dawned, the once-small sugar importers had transformed into a force to be reckoned with.

The Muljis and the Bhiwandiwallas partnership laid the foundation for one of India’s most formidable shipping legacies. 

Enter 19-year-old Vasant Sheth, armed with ambition and an invitation to study in Britain and America.

During his travels, he met I.S. Chopra of the Indian Foreign Service, who, intrigued by the young Sheth’s vision, encouraged him to stay in touch.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 06

The Moment, Sailing into History

In Washington, Chopra introduced Vasant to a lawyer with a golden tip: the US Maritime Commission was offloading Liberty ships—workhorses of the war, built to withstand U-boat attacks—at throwaway prices. With thick hulls and minimal machinery, these vessels weren’t luxurious but built to last.

It was a perfect first ship.
A $25,000 application fee later, the firm officially applied under A.H. Bhiwandiwalla and Company. Three months passed. Then, a telegram from India’s Ministry of External Affairs: the vessel had been granted. 

The first Great Eastern ship—Jagvijay, meaning ‘World Victory’—was delivered on May 3, 1948. India’s independence, the war’s end, and perfect timing aligned to create history. 

And with that, The Great Eastern Shipping Company (GE Shipping) was born.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 07

Of New India

As business boomed, a family advisor, H.T. Parekh, offered a word of wisdom—separate sugar from shipping. The firm agreed. And now, the focus was solely on navigating the high seas.

The world had changed post-war, and Japan was desperate to rebuild. In 1951, just released from Allied occupation, the nation needed partners.

Great Eastern took a bold step, becoming the first Indian company to place shipbuilding orders with Japan’s Mitsubishi Shipyard.

K.M. Sheth, the next-generation leader, took charge. Living in Japan, he oversaw the construction of the Jagjamuna and Jagganga, solidifying Indo-Japanese trade relations at a 

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 08

Of GE Shipping When Timing & Vision Aligned

Great Eastern secured another first in India—an exclusive all-India agency for Japan’s Yamashita Steamship Company.

Meanwhile, in Germany, Blohm & Voss shipyards struggled to find buyers for their revolutionary new barge vessel designs. 

No one was biting—except Great Eastern. The firm placed orders for Jag Dev and Jag Darshan, which later inspired the Hindustan Shipyard in Visakhapatnam to build four more: Jagdish, Jagdharma, Jagdev, and Jagdoot. Jagdhir was eventually sold to the Tata Group.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 09

Boom, War, and the Need for Oil

The 1950s and ’60s saw an explosion in global shipping demand, fueled by the Korean War (1950–1953) and the 1956 Suez Canal crisis, which forced ships to reroute around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope.

The extra 15-day journey meant soaring freight rates and massive profits. Great Eastern capitalized on this boom and, in 1956, acquired India’s first oil tanker—Jagjyoti. The oil game had begun.

Then came 1962. The Indo-China War tightened India’s foreign exchange reserves, while consecutive droughts threatened food security. India needed to charter ships but was bleeding dollars in commission fees. 

K.M. Sheth made a radical proposal—India should control its shipping. His recommendation led to the creation of Transchart in 1964, ensuring government cargo moved on Indian-flagged vessels and nationalizing the country’s chartering operations.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 10

Oil Crisis, Embargoes & the Changing Tides

Great Eastern sailed through global conflicts that reshaped the shipping industry—the 1967 Suez Canal closure, the 1973 Yom Kippur War that triggered an oil crisis, the 1979 Iran-Iraq War, and the 1990 Gulf War.

Each time, as the world panicked, Great Eastern strategized. The early 1990s brought another twist. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) ruled that all tankers must have double hulls to prevent oil spills.

Single-hull vessels became obsolete overnight. Panic selling ensued. But Great Eastern took a contrarian view—these ships could still be profitable if managed well. 

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 11

From Jag Laadki to Jag Prakash

The company swooped in as government licensing restrictions eased and liberalization kicked in, acquiring vessels at bargain prices. A daring bet that paid off.

One such vessel, the Jaglaadki, made history by becoming the first Indian crude oil tanker to dock in America post the Oil Pollution Act 1990. Great Eastern built its first double-hull tanker, Jag Prakash, in 2007 at South Korea’s STX Shipyard, future-proofing its fleet.

Today, the company is a $2 billion giant, commanding a fleet of 43 ships, a testament to decades of strategic vision and resilience.

Story of Great Eastern Shipping Storytelling 00 12

Riding the Waves

The shipping industry is evolving, driven by climate policies, green energy initiatives, and digital advancements. GE Shipping understands that the tides are shifting, and they are not just watching from the shore but actively steering the change. 

The company is investing in green ships and has already lined up new fuel-efficient, lower-emission vessels to reduce its environmental footprint. As India pushes for greater energy independence, GE Shipping is expanding its offshore operations and strengthening its oil and gas logistics role. 

At the same time, technology is reshaping the maritime world, with AI, automation, and predictive analytics driving efficiency. GE Shipping is embracing these innovations, ensuring they stay ahead of the curve in the next phase of global shipping. 

It has been five years, and yet 2020 remains as fresh a memory as yesterday. The lockdown caused businesses and the stock market to go into a slumber. However, the market post-COVID has recorded a strong rebound over the last five years, such that in 2025, twenty stocks that were seen as risky investments in 2020 recorded a return of nearly 50 times this year. What caused the surge? Let’s decode.

List of COVID Stocks That Grew 50x:

Company NamePrevious Close (Rs.)Price Change in 5 years (%)1-year Return %Net Profit (FY2024) (Rs. Cr.
PG Electroplast936.9331.29361.12137.01
Transformers & Rectifiers (India)514.75181.19120.4647.01
CG Power and Industrial Solutions615.95117.6612.151004.36
Zen Technologies1,453.6057.7840129.5
BSE5,620.8557.3390.87699.84
Gravita India1,781.6054.1357.38242.28
BLS International Services404.2554.1110.09325.62
HBL Engineering528.547.131.8262.66
Sarda Energy & Minerals528.946.65123.12508.63
Jupiter Wagons376.4545.8-5.3333.74
Elecon Engineering Company455.145.45-11.71349.7
Neuland Laboratories12,052.5541.9276.12300.08
Action Construction Equipment1,298.7038.8-18.73328.2
Godawari Power And Ispat206.236.7335.6922.18
Inox Wind158.5633.7714.91-50.78
Reliance Power43.1632.5524.02-2242.18
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra)59.9431.86-29.32-1228.44
Suzlon Energy57.4931.2729.03660.35
Titagarh Rail Systems825.730.11-17.16291.04
NAVA Limited524.9528.7994.561255.32
(Data as of 4th April 2025 taken based on the five-year returns of the 20 COVID stocks 
Source: NSE and MoneyControl) 

Overview of The Top COVID Stocks That Gave 50x Returns in 5 Years

  1. PG Electroplast Limited:

PG Electroplast Limited (PGEL), the flagship company of PG Group, was incorporated in 2003 and has grown into a leading provider of Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) in India. The company specializes in Original Design Manufacturing (ODM), Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM), and plastic injection molding, catering to over 45 Indian and global brands across consumer durables, consumer electronics, bathroom fittings, and automotive industries.

With over 3,800 employees, PGEL has expanded its capabilities through capacity enhancements, diversification, and backward integration. The company reported a turnover of Rs.2,148 crores in FY2023 and has grown over 10 times in the last eight years, reaching Rs.2,760 crores in FY2024 at a CAGR of 34%. Sustainability initiatives include solar energy adoption and waste management programs, with nearly 50% of energy needs met through renewable sources. Source: Annual Report

  1. Transformers & Rectifiers (India) Limited:

Transformers & Rectifiers (India) Limited (TRIL) manufactures power, furnace, and rectifier transformers, catering to power generation, transmission, distribution, and industrial sectors. Established in 1981 and headquartered in Ahmedabad, TRIL operates on a B2B model and has expanded its presence to over 25 countries, with more than 16,000 installations worldwide. 

The company offers diverse transformers, including power transformers up to 500MVA & 1200kV class, specialty transformers, series & shunt reactors, and mobile substations. TRIL has completed dynamic short circuit tests on over 135 transformers at recognized laboratories such as KEMA and CPRI. As of FY2024, the company reported its highest-ever order inflow of Rs.2,049 crores and a standalone revenue of Rs.1,273.31 crores. Source: Annual Report

  1. CG Power and Industrial Solutions:

CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited is a global enterprise providing end-to-end solutions for utilities, industries, and consumers in electrical energy management. Headquartered in Mumbai, the company has a legacy of over 86 years and operates in two key segments: Industrial Systems and Power Systems. It manufactures various products, including motors, drives, traction motors, propulsion systems, transformers, switchgear, and signaling relays, catering to industrial, power, and railway sectors. 

In recent years, CG has expanded into consumer appliances, including fans, pumps, and water heaters. The company operates manufacturing facilities across nine locations in India and one in Sweden. Now a part of the Murugappa Group, CG has focused on capacity expansion, investing Rs.220 crores in production. In FY24, it reported consolidated revenue of Rs.8,046 crores, reflecting a 15% YoY growth. The company also distributed an interim dividend of Rs.199 crores and received a credit rating upgrade to ‘IND AA+’/Stable. Source: Annual Report

  1. Zen Technologies Limited:

Zen Technologies Limited is a defense technology company specializing in combat training and counter-drone solutions. Established in 1993 and headquartered in Hyderabad, India, the company designs develops and manufactures advanced simulation and security systems for the Indian armed forces, paramilitary forces, and state police. Its product portfolio includes training simulation equipment, anti-drone systems with a detection range of up to 4 km, and annual maintenance contracts. 

Zen dominates tank simulators, with a market share exceeding 95%. The company has expanded into international markets, particularly in the Middle East, Africa, and CIS countries. In FY24, it reported revenue of Rs.430.28 crores, marking a 167% increase from the previous year, with an order book valued at approximately Rs.1,402 crores as of March 31, 2024. Over the last five years, Zen has invested Rs.85+ crores in R&D and has applied for more than 155 patents. Source: Annual Report

  1. BSE Limited:

BSE Limited, formerly the Bombay Stock Exchange, is India’s first stock exchange, established in 1875 on Dalal Street, Mumbai. It was also Asia’s first stock exchange and the first in India to receive permanent recognition under the Securities Contract Regulation Act of 1956. BSE provides a trading platform for equities, debt instruments, derivatives, mutual funds, and commodities. It is recognized for its trading speed of 6 microseconds, making it the fastest stock exchange in the world. 

The exchange introduced the S&P BSE SENSEX in 1986 as a benchmark for market performance and became India’s first listed stock exchange in 2017. In FY 2023-24, BSE reported a total income of Rs.1,617.90 crores, marking a 70% year-on-year increase, while its net profit grew by 97% to Rs.404.14 crores. The company also created a Capital Redemption Reserve of Rs.1,730.64 crores due to share buybacks. Source: Annual Report and Company Website

NIFTY50 During 2020-2025:

AD 4nXcGdO4hfcqir4XdXSx0OcnCQ1MVHc5ZkFQ83hUrw2XKAckZD68P IUlFn7NU3eH76twlW Z4d6p0qLCw6l5jE0P 1jb3n9Bf5AbWPpyl
Source: Money Control 

Between 2020 and 2025, the NIFTY 50 demonstrated positive growth, marked by periods of volatility and recovery. In 2020, the index rebounded strongly from the COVID-19-induced market crash, delivering a return of approximately 16.1%. This momentum continued in 2021 with a peak annual return of 24.6%, supported by strong corporate earnings and economic recovery. However, in 2022, market returns moderated to 4.3%, reflecting global uncertainties and inflation concerns. The index regained strength in 2023, posting a return of around 19.8%, driven by domestic inflows and economic resilience.

In 2024, the NIFTY 50 reached an all-time high of 26,277.35 in September before experiencing a correction, ultimately closing the year with a 9.4% gain. Despite some fluctuations, the positive trend extended into early 2025, with the index rebounding in March after earlier declines. Finally, as of 4th April 2025, NIFTY50 generated a return of 183.34%.

Bottomline:

The Indian stock market between 2020 and 2025 demonstrated a notable recovery and overall growth. The 50 times return by 20 stocks likely represents a confluence of a recovering market, specific sectoral booms fueled by government policies and global events, and company-level performance, potentially amplified by market enthusiasm surrounding the “COVID stock” narrative. 

Identifying such high-growth opportunities requires understanding macroeconomic trends, sector-specific dynamics, and a thorough analysis of individual company fundamentals. So the next time the market inclines towards one sentiment, analyze every factor and decide to invest accordingly. 

FAQs

  1. What are COVID stocks?

    COVID stocks refer to companies that experienced significant price appreciation during or after the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2025). These stocks benefited from changing economic conditions, increased demand for specific products/services, or investor sentiment shifts triggered by the pandemic.

  2. Did all COVID stocks sustain their growth?

    Not necessarily. While some companies maintained strong performance due to continued demand and structural changes in the economy, others saw corrections as market conditions normalized.

  3. Is investing during a market downturn a good strategy?

    Investing during a downturn can be a strategic opportunity, as stock prices often fall below their intrinsic value. Historically, market recoveries have rewarded long-term investors who buy quality stocks during economic downturns. However, not all downturns follow the same recovery pattern, and careful research is essential.

The Indian government’s latest divestment move has placed Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL) in the spotlight. On April 3, 2025, it was announced that the Centre would sell up to 4.83% stake in the defense PSU through an Offer for Sale (OFS). As part of its broader divestment agenda, this step is intended to enhance liquidity and promote wider public ownership in public sector undertakings (PSUs). This development is relevant to market observers and those tracking the defense and PSU sectors. (Source: www.reuters.com)

AD 4nXeUUrtc OnDcDDsbwBY1yft0wwwjxfa5zPvc4yFTXu5ONrn618toKoo25xZboVYnf X6j1ByECjyNqBlHj2VE lKNwOK5ZqSo6HzPiUl1A76syeYq2nYr

Source: (www.tradingview.com

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL)

MDL is one of India’s leading defense shipyards, operating under the Ministry of Defence. It is involved in building warships and submarines for the Indian Navy, as well as offshore platforms and vessels for oil exploration. Established in 1934 and nationalized in 1960, MDL has contributed to key naval programs, including Project 15B and Project 75.

Since its public listing in 2020, MDL has attracted interest from various market participants owing to its operational scale and a consistent inflow of defense-related projects.

The Offer for Sale (OFS): What Are the Details?

What is an OFS?
An Offer for Sale (OFS) allows existing shareholders of a listed company, often promoters or governments, to sell their stake through the stock exchange platform. It is a transparent mechanism for offloading shares without issuing new equity. Unlike an IPO, proceeds from an OFS go to the seller, not the company.

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders OFS
The government has announced plans to sell 11.4 million shares (2.83%) with an option to sell an additional 2%, totaling 4.83%. The floor price is ₹2,525 per share, an 8% discount to the closing price on April 3, 2025. The OFS opened for non-retail investors on April 4 and retail investors on April 7. The government’s holding would reduce from 84.83% to 80% if fully subscribed. (Source:www.livemint.com)

Stock Performance in Recent Years

MDL’s stock has shown significant appreciation in recent years:

  • 1-Month Return: +27%
  • 6-Month Return: +34%
  • 1-Year Return: +145%
  • 3-Year Return: +2,076%

Factors contributing to this performance include defense sector tailwinds, steady order execution, and strong investor sentiment around indigenization in defense manufacturing. Past performance may not guarantee future results, but these metrics provide context for MDL’s recent valuation trends. (Source:www.livemint.com)

Financial Strengths and Fundamentals

MDL reports a clean balance sheet with minimal debt and consistent revenue growth. As of FY24, its market capitalization stood at ₹1,02,947 crore, with a current share price of ₹2,552. The stock has experienced volatility, reaching a 52-week high of ₹2,930 and a low of ₹1,045. It trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 37.4, and its book value is ₹181 per share. The dividend yield is 0.53%, and the face value of the stock is ₹5.00.

In terms of historical performance, the company has recorded returns of 149% over the past year and 171% over the past three years. Its profit growth over three years has been approximately 47%, while sales have grown at a CAGR of 32.7% over the same timeframe. Revenue for FY24 was ₹11,361 crore, compared to ₹9,467 crore in the previous year and ₹7,827 crore the year before.

Operational metrics indicate an EBITDA margin of around 21% and a net profit margin of 14–15%. The company’s return on capital employed (ROCE) is 44.2%, and the return on equity (ROE) is 35.2%. MDL’s order book is estimated at over ₹38,000 crores, largely comprising defense-related contracts. These figures offer insight into the financial structure and capacity of the organization. (Source: https://www.screener.in/)

Rationale Behind the Stake Sale

The stake sale is part of the government’s broader disinvestment strategy, aimed at meeting the required minimum public shareholding norms set by SEBI, mobilizing funds for public expenditure, and encouraging wider retail and institutional ownership in PSUs.

The disinvestment target for FY25 is ₹50,000 crore, and the Mazagon Dock OFS contributes to this fiscal plan. (Source:www.livemint.com)

Market Reactions and Observations

Initial market response to the OFS announcement included a dip in the stock price, which is common in such events due to the anticipated increase in free float. Some brokerage firms have commented on MDL’s long-term role in the defense sector and have noted its strong financials and execution track record. However, these views represent external opinions and should be interpreted with caution.

Considerations for Market Participants

Before participating in an OFS, investors often consider:
  • The gap between the floor price and the current market price
  • The company’s historical performance and sector trends
  • Broader market conditions and liquidity
  • Risks such as execution delays or policy shifts

While the discounted floor price may appear attractive, short-term price movements post-OFS can vary based on demand and supply dynamics.

    Conclusion

    The government’s decision to divest a stake in Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders aligns with its broader PSU reform and fiscal management goals. The company’s recent performance and involvement in strategic defense projects position it as a significant player.

    This event may be noteworthy for analysts tracking government disinvestment moves or studying market reactions to PSU stake sales. As with any market development, participants must assess based on individual investment criteria and risk preferences.

    1. What is the purpose of the OFS in this case?

      The government is using the OFS mechanism to reduce its stake in Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders and meet its fiscal disinvestment targets. This also helps increase public shareholding.

    2. Who can participate in the OFS?

      Both institutional and retail investors can participate. The first day is reserved for non-retail (institutional) investors, while retail investors get access on the second day.

    3. Is the OFS price always lower than the market price?

      Not always, but in many cases, including this one, a discount is offered to attract investors and ensure adequate subscription.

    4. Will the OFS affect MDL’s stock price?

      The short-term impact may include volatility due to increased supply. However, long-term performance depends on business fundamentals and broader market sentiment.

    5. Is MDL raising any new capital through this OFS?

      No, the company is not issuing new shares or raising funds. The OFS involves only the government offloading part of its existing stake.

    Frequently asked questions

    Get answers to the most pertinent questions on your mind now.

    [faq_listing]
    What is an Investment Advisory Firm?

    An investment advisory firm is a company that helps investors make decisions about buying and selling securities (like stocks) in exchange for a fee. They can advise clients directly or provide advisory reports and other publications about specific securities, such as high growth stock recommendations. Some firms use both methods, like Research & Ranking, India’s leading stock advisory company, specializing in smart investments and long-term stocks since 2015.

    An investment advisory firm is a company that helps investors make decisions about buying and selling securities (like stocks) in exchange for a fee. They can advise clients directly or provide advisory reports and other publications about specific securities, such as high growth stock recommendations. Some firms use both methods, like Research & Ranking, India’s leading stock advisory company, specializing in smart investments and long-term stocks since 2015.

    An investment advisory firm is a company that helps investors make decisions about buying and selling securities (like stocks) in exchange for a fee. They can advise clients directly or provide advisory reports and other publications about specific securities, such as high growth stock recommendations. Some firms use both methods, like Research & Ranking, India’s leading stock advisory company, specializing in smart investments and long-term stocks since 2015.

    An investment advisory firm is a company that helps investors make decisions about buying and selling securities (like stocks) in exchange for a fee. They can advise clients directly or provide advisory reports and other publications about specific securities, such as high growth stock recommendations. Some firms use both methods, like Research & Ranking, India’s leading stock advisory company, specializing in smart investments and long-term stocks since 2015.